Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Oncologist ; 26(4): 288-e541, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1068692

ABSTRACT

LESSONS LEARNED: Despite the initial optimism for using immune checkpoint inhibition in the treatment of multiple myeloma, subsequent clinical studies have been disappointing. Preclinical studies have suggested that priming the immune system with various modalities in addition to checkpoint inhibition may overcome the relative T-cell exhaustion or senescence; however, in this small data set, radiotherapy with checkpoint inhibition did not appear to activate the antitumor immune response. BACKGROUND: Extramedullary disease (EMD) is recognized as an aggressive subentity of multiple myeloma (MM) with a need for novel therapeutic approaches. We therefore designed a proof-of-principle pilot study to evaluate the synergy between the combination of the anti-PD-L1, avelumab, and concomitant hypofractionated radiotherapy. METHODS: This was a single-arm phase II Simon two-stage single center study that was prematurely terminated because of the COVID-19 pandemic after enrolling four patients. Key eligibility included patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who had exhausted or were not candidates for standard therapy and had at least one lesion amenable to radiotherapy. Patients received avelumab until progression or intolerable toxicity and hypofractionated radiotherapy to a focal lesion in cycle 2. Radiotherapy was delayed until cycle 2 to allow the avelumab to reach a study state, given the important observation from previous studies that concomitant therapy is needed for the abscopal effect. RESULTS: At a median potential follow-up of 10.5 months, there were no objective responses, one minimal response, and two stable disease as best response. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5-7.1 months), and no deaths occurred. There were no grade ≥3 and five grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Avelumab in combination with radiotherapy for patients with RRMM and EMD was associated with very modest systemic clinical benefit; however, patients did benefit as usual from local radiotherapy. Furthermore, the combination was very well tolerated compared with historical RRMM treatment regimens.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Multiple Myeloma , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Myeloma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/radiotherapy , Pandemics , Pilot Projects
2.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(12): 1096-1102, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1018215

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The coronavirus pandemic is affecting global health systems, endangering daily patient care. Hemato-oncological patients are particularly vulnerable to infection, requiring decisive recommendations on treatment and triage. The aim of this survey amongst experts on radiation therapy (RT) for lymphoma and leukemia is to delineate typical clinical scenarios and to provide counsel for high-quality care. METHODS: A multi-item questionnaire containing multiple-choice and free-text questions was developed in a peer-reviewed process and sent to members of the radiation oncology panels of the German Hodgkin Study Group and the German Lymphoma Alliance. Answers were assessed online and analyzed centrally. RESULTS: Omission of RT was only considered in a minority of cases if alternative treatment options were available. Hypofractionated regimens and reduced dosages may be used for indolent lymphoma and fractures due to multiple myeloma. Overall, there was a tendency to shorten RT rather than to postpone or omit it. Even in case of critical resource shortage, panelists agreed to start emergency RT for typical indications (intracranial pressure, spinal compression, superior vena cava syndrome) within 24 h. Possible criteria to consider for patient triage are the availability of (systemic) options, the underlying disease dynamic, and the treatment rationale (curative/palliative). CONCLUSION: RT for hemato-oncological patients receives high-priority and should be maintained even in later stages of the pandemic. Hypofractionation and shortened treatment schedules are feasible options for well-defined constellations, but have to be discussed in the clinical context.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Lymphoma/radiotherapy , Multiple Myeloma/radiotherapy , Pandemics , Radiation Oncology/standards , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Triage/standards , Appointments and Schedules , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Testing , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Diagnosis, Differential , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Humans , Hygiene/standards , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Lymphoma/complications , Lymphoma/drug therapy , Multiple Myeloma/complications , Osteolysis/etiology , Osteolysis/radiotherapy , Personal Protective Equipment , Radiation Oncology/methods , Radiation Pneumonitis/diagnosis , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/etiology , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/radiotherapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time-to-Treatment , Whole-Body Irradiation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL